At the end of the 2022 Qatar International Football Federation (FIFA) World Cup, keen attention is focused on the appointment of the national football team coach, which was vacant due to the expiration of the contract of coach Paulo Bento (54. Portugal). The biggest concern is whether it is a domestic director or a foreign director. Opinions differ on this topic. First of all, the justification for advocates of domestic supervision is fostering domestic leaders. Since the FIFA World Cup in South Africa in 2010, Korean football has been sticking to the foreign coaching system. This is a policy that is contrary to Japan, which is a rival relationship, and it can not be a serious task given to Korean football.
Korean football has succeeded in advancing to the FIFA World Cup finals 10 times in a row, 6th in the world following Brazil, Germany, Italy, Argentina and Spain. It cannot be denied that it was prioritized. However, in this reality, Korean soccer has only been obsessed with foreign coaches for the national team, and there is no aspect of neglect in fostering domestic leaders. Among the current domestic leaders, you can find any number of leaders who have competitive leadership in the FIFA World Cup final stage, such as Japan. Therefore, Korean soccer now needs to break away from the prejudice that domestic coaches are ‘no’.
Ultimately, the development of players’ skills through professional soccer (K-League) was achieved by the leadership of domestic coaches, not foreign coaches. As a result, the evaluation of the leadership of Korean leaders who have entered the Asian region, including Chinese professional football, is raging, recording a top score. Of course, the leadership required for the FIFA World Cup challenge stage is different from that in the K-League and Asian countries. However, if Korean football neglects this, Korean leaders will have no choice but to be negligent in seeking self-development based on motivation. The current domestic leader is different from the past. As an armed leader with a strong passion for soccer, he is also actively working to implement his soccer philosophy according to the world soccer trend while striving for his own development.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup in North and Central America, co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico, has expanded the number of participating countries from 32 to 48, increasing Korea’s chances of advancing to the finals for the 11th consecutive FIFA World Cup. Therefore, the Korean soccer team has to focus on nurturing leaders by appointing domestic coaches instead of foreign coaches as national team coaches. After the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, the Korea Football Association (KFA) quickly sought change. The search for this is the fact that Michael Müller (58, Germany), a foreigner from Germany, was appointed as the chairman of the power reinforcement committee, who has a lot of nutritional power in appointing the national team coach. This is the first time in 90 years since the establishment of KFA in 1933, and expectations are high.
However, on the 11th, Michael Müller, chairman of the Power Enhancement Committee, announced the five principles for appointing national team coaches: 1. Professionalism 2. Coach experience 3. Coach motivation 4. Teamwork ability 5. Environmental factors. Judging by the fact that he revealed his opinion on whether or not there was a residency problem, the appointment of a foreign coach for the national team cannot be completely ruled out. A survey was released showing that more than half of the people, 56%, answered ‘nationality doesn’t matter’ to the national team appointment question. When facing this point, a re-evaluation of the domestic leader should be made in the case of the appointment of the national team.먹튀검증
Korean soccer is proud of Korean soccer by achieving splendid feats such as the semifinals of the 1983 Mexico FIFA World Youth Championship (U-20), the bronze medal at the 2012 London Olympics, and the runner-up in the 2019 Poland U-20 FIFA World Cup as a domestic coach. and raised pride. In the end, this kind of pride and pride has become an asset of the leadership of domestic leaders and is now a strong support for Korean football. Of course, there is a condition that the coach of the soccer team must also be a person with leadership skills that matches the improvement in skills and thinking due to the player’s advancement into Europe and other countries. Given the current situation, the reality is that opportunities for domestic leaders to appoint national coaches will inevitably decrease.
Football development cannot be achieved only by the players. Leader training must go hand in hand. From this point of view, Japan’s fast-footed domestic leader training is a ‘calculation stone’ for Korean football. Clearly, Japanese football is producing more foreign players, including Europeans, than Korean football. Therefore, it is nonsense for Korean soccer to suggest a guideline for accepting and accepting overseas players as a condition for appointing a national team coach. The KFA announced plans to complete the appointment of the national team coach by February. Even if a foreign leader takes over the helm of the national team again, we must not forget the necessity of nurturing domestic leaders.